In 1976, historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich penned the now-famous line, “Well-behaved women seldom make history.” She was writing in reference to women who appeared in the record of seventeenth century New England ministerial literature, and the women she studied had been that rare exception. Ulrich, looking at over 50 eulogies written for New England Puritan women, asked the question: what makes a woman memorable?
The question of memorability was raised in my own work as the Rose Tucker Editorial Fellow for the Oregon Historical Quarterly (OHQ) earlier this year, when I conducted photo research and fact checking for an article on Oregon labor feminism by historian Laurie Mercier. My search for images to accompany the article took me deeper into the OHS Research Library archives than I’d ever gone before, and yet instead of finding photos, I found myself hitting wall after wall. Mercier’s article, “Breadwinning, Equity, and Solidarity: Labor Feminism in Oregon, 1945–1970,” available this week in the Spring 2019 issue of OHQ, definitively proved the significant presence of women in Oregon’s labor movements in the mid-twentieth century. So where was the photographic evidence?
The simple answer is, it doesn’t exist. Many of the photos taken (and later saved) are of formal occasions or board meetings, when the people in charge were all there. The people in charge, in this particular instance, included so few women that they could often be counted on a single finger. Women and their work showed up in the record again and again — in newspaper articles, annual conference proceeding notes, and oral histories — but rarely with the same accolades or narratives that called for a photo. Even titled women such as Mildred Ripley Gianini, the first female vice-president of the Oregon Federation of Labor, were reduced to single portrait photographs.
It was difficult to reconcile the vibrant women Mercier’s research brought back into the historical conversation with their near-complete absence from the archival photographic record. I found myself appreciating the article much more, having gone through a considerable amount of Mercier’s primary source documentation at OHS, knowing how much careful reading and piecing together she employed to establish the active and impactful presence of women in Oregon’s labor movement. Despite the OHS Research Library’s extensive collections from the Oregon AFL and Oregon labor leaders such as Nellie Fox-Edwards, after a month of searching I found only a handful of pictures of labor women. Even Fox-Edwards’ own photos often mirrored the photos of the male labor leaders: pictures of her with famous or important individuals. Take Fox-Edwards out of the room, and there were seemingly no famous or important women to photograph at all.
Where photographs of women were absent, a multitude of misogynistic letters to and about women abounded. The papers of Oregon Representative Edith Green had folders of carefully filed letters from constituents in support or opposition to bills she sponsored, such as the Equal Pay Act. One letter from a Portland resident, dated July 21, 1963, began: “Mrs. Green, I do not care for the aggressive, feministic spirit which you display or the trending attitude toward feministic domination in our nation.” Another 1963 letter, from the then-Vice President of the North Pacific Lumber Company, observed that women had higher rates of absenteeism, were less interested in becoming career workers, and were often unable to attend regular meetings that the company scheduled outside of “normal business hours” because of their domestic obligations. The letter writer would not claim that women were unequal to men, but simply wanted his opinion noted that “a human being should be judged on his merit.” Green’s reply to the writer showed remarkable patience, but her emphatically scribbled note on the letter (“A bit contradictory!”) betrayed that she read it and had been frustrated, just as I was, 56 years later.
Six years after Green wrote that “the record is replete with instances of wage discrimination against [women],” an article in the Oregonian covered a job discrimination committee hearing. It recorded the testimony of one John Brown who “reported he is confident that there is some discrimination against women, particularly in the custodial field, but [he said], ‘we need to know some things. What can a woman do? Can she run a boiler?’”
What can a woman do? Can a woman run a boiler? Can a woman organize in the workplace? Can a woman serve as an executive in a labor union? Like Edith Green, I find myself exasperatedly citing “volumes of testimony” proving that yes, a woman can do these things.
But I don’t know if I could find you many pictures of it.
Laurie Mercier will present her research at the upcoming Pacific Northwest Labor History Association conference, “General Strike 1919–2019: Radicalism, Repression, and Solidarity,” held at Portland State University on May 3–5, 2019.
The views expressed in user comments do not reflect the views of OHS. The Oregon Historical Society does not participate in political campaigns, nor do we support or oppose candidates.